Course Content and Class
Discussions
It
is our beliefs and values that shape what we will create, (Coeira, 2004). How
does this relate to health technologies? This is discussed in the article, Four Rules for the Reinvention of Health
Care
Last
week, we discussed health technologies in clinical practice settings and
focused on mainly the implications to nursing practice related to the patients.
This week is part two, and we will be discussing the use of health technologies
in clinical practice settings from the perspective of the health care
practitioner.
Sassen,
(2009), believes that the importance of nurses’ attitudes and opinions of EHRs
should not be underestimated because fifty percent of information systems fail
due to users unwilling to accept them.
The goal of the EHR is designed to decrease paperwork, save time for nurses, improve documentation, decrease liability, improve access to patient information, and most importantly enhance patient outcomes, (Sassen, 2009). This cannot occur if nurses are not on board with the use of these new technology systems.
The goal of the EHR is designed to decrease paperwork, save time for nurses, improve documentation, decrease liability, improve access to patient information, and most importantly enhance patient outcomes, (Sassen, 2009). This cannot occur if nurses are not on board with the use of these new technology systems.
Check
out the video below, Meals Per Hour, to
see how technology can influence people to become more efficient!
Videos/Learning Tools
Nursing Implications
The implications this has on nursing practice
is that they feel it may not be geared enough towards the needs of nurses,
(Sassen, 2009) and it is because of this that many may have developed a poor
attitude towards it. This negative attitude could spill over into the interaction
with the client and cause damage to the nurse-client therapeutic relationship.
Although damage to this relationship could occur
regardless, as Sassen (2009) argues, the use of EHRs that rely so heavily on
the use of technology could do the same. And many nurses feel it is unable to
grasp the intangible aspects of nursing, (Sassen, 2009). This could in turn take
away nurses time with patients and impersonalize the art of nursing.
As mentioned in my previous blog (Week 7: Electronic
Health Technologies within Clinical Practice Settings-Part 1), I myself was
reluctant to use the EMR program implemented during my time working in a
physician’s office. And after considering the viewpoints of Sassen, I can see
how, in a different setting, my hesitancy could cause a larger issue for my
client and in turn affect the impact I will have on that client’s health
outcome.
Readings and Additional References
Caldwell,
A., Young, A., Gomez-Marquez, J., & Olsen, K. (2011). Global health
technology 2.0. Global Health Initiative,
63-67.
Coeira,
E. (2004). Four rules for the reinvention of health care. Education and Debate, 1197-1199.
Sassen,
E. J. (2009). Love, hate, or indifference: How nurses really feel about the
electronic health record system. Computers,
Informatics, Nursing, 281-287.
No comments:
Post a Comment